.

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Odysseus: Hero or Villain? Compare odysseus to modern-day CEO's, with relevance to situational ethics in Homer's Odyssey.

Odysseus: Hero or Villain? Whether in times of contend or in times of peace, contend has not ceased nor go past ever cease as long as in that location are domain upon this Earth. Within these worldly concern originates the essence of fray: rationalization. Presupposing that there is no external vinegarishce of absolute truth, it is extremity to decipher all we encounter, in an attempt to find self-explanation. Although humans are, in part, physically the same, mentally they are vastly dissimilar. The sour by which each individual interprets their surroundings is different, subsequently creating smorgasbord of self-explanation between members of the human race. An individuals set of unique rationalizations forms the baseline standards and ethics to which that person adheres. Therefore, one can say the belief of ethics has not changed over the years; right to one is blackguard to another. Thus, ethics are carried out and adjusted on a situational basis, in accord ance with relative truth. We then find Odysseus of Homers Odyssey greatly corresponds to some modern mean solar day chief operating curve upicers and their respective practices. Sam Waksal, former CEO of ImClone, allegedly inform close friends and family about the defensive measure of the companys malignant neoplastic disease drug Erbitux before publicly announced (With Insider Trading, The severalise is Who Knew What and How They Knew It, Catherine Valenti, abcnews.com). incessantly since ImClone made known their pending approval by the FDA for their miracle crab louse drug, stock prices steadily increased. Waksal received the FDAs repartee denying approval for Erbitux.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom e   ssays are written by professional writers!
FDA denial would cause stock price to pass dramatically; for Waksal to candidly and legally sell stock and further money, prior revelation to the public was required first. Waksal allegedly withheld the information until family members and friends sold off stock so they didnt lose money, which is illegal. The inquire is not whether Waksal stone-broke the Law, but... ...essay, but it generalizes CEOs too broadly. Correlating Oydessus and modern day CEOs is a stretch. concur it simple and just deal with the concept of relative ethics. If you sine qua non to get a full essay, club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment